1)

The following question consist of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

 Statement: Should India engage into a dialogue with neighbouring countries to stop cross-border tension?

Arguments: I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the cross-border terrorism and stop loss of innocent lives.

II. No. Neighbouring countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage in subversive activities.


A) if only argument I is strong

B) if only argument II is strong

C) if either I or II is strong

D) if neither I nor II is strong

E) if both I and II are strong.

Answer:

Option A

Explanation:

Clearly, peaceful settlement through mutual agreement is the best option, whatever be the issue. So, argument I holds strong Moreover, the problem indicated in II can be curbed by constant check and vigilance. So, II seems to be vague.